Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7505766›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1994

Expression of (cac)n/(gtg)n simple repetitive sequences in mRNA of human lymphocytes.

C Epplen, J T Epplen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent observations in human DNA-minisatellite mutations.International journal of legal medicine · 1995
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C EpplenRuhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
J T Epplen
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Di- and trinucleotide tandem repeat sequences are ubiquitously interspersed and are often polymorphic in the human genome. We have analyzed the transcription of simple (cac)n/(gtg)n repeats in the cDNA of RNA from human lymphocytes. When using such motifs as probes in RNA hybridization experiments, distinct signals are scarcely demonstrable. In order to investigate mRNA sequences that contain such simple repeats, 1 million phage clones from cDNA libraries were screened with the probe (CAC)5. From 50 hybridizing phages, 38 clones were successfully isolated and characterized. The lengths of the transcripts ranged from 120 bp to 3.5 kb. More than 15 different additional simple repeat motifs were found immediately next to or distant to the (cac)n/(gtg)n repeat. In 12 clones, significant homologies were identified with a wide variety of unrelated genes, such as a processed pseudogene of human ubiquitin, serin protease inhibitor genes, a gene candidate from yeast, and sequence-tagged sites of man and mouse. Of the clones, 18% represented mRNA of MHC class I promotor binding protein; 79% displayed novel single copy sequences or partial similarity to many different organelle and nuclear genomes of animal, fungal, bacterial, and viral sequences. These data indicate that short (cac)n/(gtg)n stretches (n < or = 6) are sometimes contained in open reading frames, but more often in the 3' and 5' untranslated portions of mature mRNAs. Longer stretches of perfect simple (cac)n/(gtg)n repeats can rarely be recovered, even from the hnRNA of human lymphocytes.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesT-LymphocytesAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCell LineClone CellsDNAGene ExpressionHumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNARNA, MessengerSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNARNARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID7505766
OpenAlexW1997031898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.