ReviewExperientia1995
Genetic knockouts in mice: an update.
Review in Experientia, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transgenic RNAi: Accelerating and expanding reverse genetics in mammals.Transgenic research · 2006Review
- Developmental mechanisms: putting genes in their place.Journal of biosciences · 2002Review
- A role of netrin-1 in the formation of the subcortical structure striatum: repulsive action on the migration of late-born striatal neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2001Article
- Gene2EST: a BLAST2 server for searching expressed sequence tag (EST) databases with eukaryotic gene-sized queries.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene disruption technology in mammals, by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells, is a powerful method to manipulate the mouse germ line. In the past decade it has produced a wealth of knowledge concerning neuronal development, neurodegenerative disorders and the roles of oncogenes, Hox genes and growth factors during development. A surprising variety of genes, however, have given unexpected and disappointing results. A gene/function redundancy theory proposed by many investigators to explain the unexpected results has been supported in certain cases by the generation of double knockout mice. Modification of the basic technology now allows the investigators to carry out a variety of manipulations including conditional or tissue-specific knockouts. This may provide a better opportunity in the future for the gene therapy approach to correct the genetic disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7498440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.