Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7479896›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1995

Mapping the mouse genome: current status and future prospects.

W F Dietrich, N G Copeland, D J Gilbert, J C Miller, N A Jenkins, E S Lander

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A comprehensive SNP-based genetic analysis of inbred mouse strains.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2005
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mouse models of genetic disease: new approaches, new paradigms.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 1998
    Review
  5. Article
  6. IRS-PCR-based genetic mapping of the huntingtin interacting protein gene (HIP1) on mouse chromosome 5.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1998
    Article
  7. A yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) library containing 10 haploid chicken genome equivalents.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1997
    Article
  8. The role of the laboratory mouse in the human genome project.American journal of human genetics · 1996
    Review
  9. Sequence tag identification of intact proteins by matching tanden mass spectral data against sequence data bases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
  10. Ahead of schedule and under budget: the Genome Project passes its fifth birthday.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1995
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

W F DietrichWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
N G Copeland
D J Gilbert
J C Miller
N A Jenkins
E S Lander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse is the best model system for the study of mammalian genetics and physiology. Because of the feasibility and importance of studying genetic crosses, the mouse genetic map has received tremendous attention in recent years. It currently contains over 14,000 genetically mapped markers, including 700 mutant loci, 3500 genes, and 6500 simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs). The mutant loci and genes allow insights and correlations concerning physiology and development. The SSLPs provide highly polymorphic anchor points that allow inheritance to be traced in any cross and provide a scaffold for assembling physical maps. Adequate physical mapping resources--notably large-insert yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) libraries--are available to support positional cloning projects based on the genetic map, but a comprehensive physical map is still a few years away. Large-scale sequencing efforts have not yet begun in mouse, but comparative sequence analysis between mouse and human is likely to provide tremendous information about gene structure and regulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingDisease Models, AnimalGenesGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersMiceMice, Mutant StrainsMutationGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID7479896
PMCPMC40528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.