Ahead of schedule and under budget: the Genome Project passes its fifth birthday.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.Journal of the history of biology · 2018
   Article
2. A sea urchin genome project: sequence scan, virtual map, and additional resources.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
   Article
3. Parallel human genome analysis: microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
   Article
4. Sequence tag identification of intact proteins by matching tanden mass spectral data against sequence data bases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as