Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7479085›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1995

CGG repeats associated with DNA instability and chromosome fragility form structures that block DNA synthesis in vitro.

K Usdin, K J Woodford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. G-Quadruplexes in Repeat Expansion Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K UsdinSection on Genomic Structure and Function, National Institute of Diabetes and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0830, USA.
K J Woodford

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large increase in the length of a CGG tandem array is associated with a number of triplet expansion diseases, including fragile X syndrome, the most common cause of heritable mental retardation in humans. Expansion results in the appearance of a fragile site on the X chromosome in the region of the CGG array. We show here that CGG repeats readily form a series of barriers to DNA synthesis in vitro. There barriers form only when the (CGG)n strand is used as the template, are K(+)-dependent, template concentration-independent, and involve hydrogen bonding between guanines. Chemical modification experiments suggest these blocks to DNA synthesis result from the formation of a series of intrastrand tetraplexes. A number of lines of evidence suggest that both triplet expansion and chromosome fragility are the result of replication defects. Our data are discussed in the light of such evidence.

Indexed as

Chromosome FragilityAcetaldehydeAlkylating AgentsBase SequenceChromosome Fragile SitesDNADNA ReplicationGuanineHydrogen BondingMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPotassiumSulfuric Acid EstersTemplates, GeneticTrinucleotide RepeatsAcetaldehydeAlkylating Agentsbromoacetaldehydedimethyl sulfateDNAGuanineOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPotassiumSulfuric Acid Esters

Identifiers

PMID7479085
PMCPMC307363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.