ReviewJournal of general internal medicine1995
Cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease: how low should we go?
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical problemTo examine the evidence supporting the recent National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommendation that low to moderate levels of cholesterol should be aggressively managed in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
methodsCohort studies and clinical trials with angiographic or clinical endpoints, that included CHD patients with low to moderate levels of cholesterol, were systematically identified through a MEDLINE search and critically reviewed. SYNOPSIS: None of the cohort studies show that a moderate level of cholesterol confers significantly increased risk of CHD death, although a pooled relative risk of 1.14 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.4) suggests that there may be a slight excess risk. Of five angiographic trials of CHD patients with moderate levels of cholesterol, two demonstrated no improvement in angiographic endpoints with intensive lipid-lowering therapy and the other three are difficult to interpret since they included other interventions in addition to the cholesterol-lowering regimen. No large clinical trial with clinical endpoints has been reported for CHD patients with low to moderate levels of cholesterol. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendation to treat CHD patients who have low to moderate levels of cholesterol with diet or drugs is not based on convincing evidence of efficacy. This is in clear contrast to the recommendation for CHD patients with high levels of cholesterol, for whom there is definitive clinical trial evidence of benefit from cholesterol-lowering therapy. While we await clinical trial results for CHD patients with low to moderate levels of cholesterol, clinicians and patients must consider the possible disadvantages of therapy in relation to the uncertain benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.