ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry1980
Assessment of brainstem damage by the auditory brainstem response in acute severe head injury.
Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 1980. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brainstem Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit: A Rationale for Real-Time, Automated Neurophysiological Monitoring.Neurocritical care · 2017Review
- Predictive value of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in children with post-traumatic coma produced by diffuse brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 1995Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of brainstem distortion associated with a supratentorial mass.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1993Article
- The combined monitoring of brain stem auditory evoked potentials and intracranial pressure in coma. A study of 57 patients.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1992Article
- Multimodality evoked potentials and early prognosis in comatose patients.Neurosurgical review · 1990Review
- Sequential changes of auditory brain stem responses in relation to intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and initiation of secondary brain stem damage.Acta neurochirurgica · 1989Article
- Serial recordings of auditory brainstem responses in severe head injury: relationship between test timing and prognostic power.Intensive care medicine · 1988Article
- Brainstem auditory evoked response and vestibulo-ocular reflex in severe head injury patients. A prospective study of 60 cases.Acta neurochirurgica · 1987Article
- Effects of an expanding supratentorial mass on the auditory brain-stem responses in baboons.Acta neurochirurgica · 1986Article
- Evoked potentials and brain stem reflexes.Neurosurgical review · 1985Review
- Neuromonitoring.Journal of neurology · 1985Article
- Brain-stem auditory-evoked potentials in post-comatose patients after severe closed head trauma.Journal of neurology · 1984Article
- Evoked potentials in severe head injury--analysis and relation to outcome.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1981Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 64 cases suffering from severe head injury (Glasgow coma scale: less than seven- the auditory brainstem responses (FARs) recorded at the vertex, which are thought to be volumet conducted far-field potentials reflecting the sequential electrical activities of the auditory afferen) system in the brainstem, were recorded in the neurosurgical intensive care room immediately after admission. The alterations in the responses were compared with the types of primary injury, neurological signs., CT findings and outcome following treatment. Based on the results obtained, it is concluded that the FAR is a useful indicator for predicting the effects of treatment on brainstem damage in patients with severe head injury, and that it provides more reliable information about the function of the brainstem than the neurological signs or CT findings. Moreover, it also offers a diagnostic method for primary brainstem injury. Three cases or primary brainstem injury without lesions in the supratentorial region were diagnosed by means of combined CT and FAR recording.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.