[The aerobic and anaerobic capacity of adolescents and catecholamine excretion during prolonged submaximal exercise (author's transl)].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Exercise as a Potential Intervention to Modulate Cancer Outcomes in Children and Adults?Frontiers in oncology · 2020
   Review
2. Metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise in children and adolescents.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2000
   Review
3. Glucose and free fatty acid utilization during prolonged exercise in prepubertal boys in relation to catecholamine responses.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1992
   Article
4. Daily physical activity levels in preadolescent boys related to VO2max and lactate threshold.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1986
   Article
5. Changes in plasma proenkephalin peptide F and catecholamine levels during graded exercise in men.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1985
   Article
6. [Behavior of free catecholamines in blood and urine of ambulance men and physicians during quick responses].International archives of occupational and environmental health · 1983
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as