Adverse reactions following T-tube removal.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Primary suture or T-tube drainage after choledochotomy.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 1986
   Trial
2. [Potential risk to patient safety by discontinuation of production of classical T-drains? : Nationwide survey in Germany and statement of the surgical working group for liver, gall bladder and pancreatic diseases (CALGP) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV)].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
   Review
3. A life-threatening complication of biliary peritonitis following T-tube removal: A case report and review of literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
   Article
4. Case-based review: bile peritonitis after T-tube removal.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2013
   Review
5. Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques.Surgical endoscopy · 2002
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as