Evidence map›Paper›PMID 6870221›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1983

Comparative pharmacokinetics of metronidazole and tinidazole as influenced by administration route.

J Mattila, P T Männistö, R Mäntylä, S Nykänen, U Lamminsivu

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1983. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Treatment Strategies for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.International journal of women's health · 2010
    Article
  16. Antibiotic consideration in bacterial vaginosis.Current infectious disease reports · 2009
    Article
  17. Guidelines for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: focus on tinidazole.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2009
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Mattila
P T Männistö
R Mäntylä
S Nykänen
U Lamminsivu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum kinetics of metronidazole and tinidazole were compared in four separate randomized crossover studies. Single doses of each drug were given to healthy volunteers through intravenous infusion (500 mg over 20 min, six persons), by mouth (500 mg, nine persons), by rectum (1,000 mg, six persons), or intravaginally (500 mg, six persons). Concentrations of the unchanged drugs in serum, measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography, were similar after oral and intravenous administration, with mean peaks of 9.0 and 9.4 micrograms/ml for metronidazole and 7.5 and 10.1 micrograms/ml for tinidazole. Concentrations of tinidazole were significantly higher than those of metronidazole from 4 h onwards after intravenous infusion, and from 3 h onwards after administration by mouth. After rectal administrations, a significant difference was seen only at 48 h. After vaginal dosing, however, concentrations of metronidazole were significantly higher than those of tinidazole between 1.5 and 12 h. Bioavailability of either drug, calculated according to the formula (area under the curve for oral administration)/(area under the curve for infusion), was practically complete after oral administration and was poorer after rectal and especially vaginal administration. Whenever the parameters were calculable, the elimination half-life of tinidazole (range of means, 14.0 to 14.7 h) was significantly longer and total clearance (40.3 to 47.6 ml/min) was lower than the corresponding values of metronidazole (7.9 to 8.8 h and 71.8 to 80.1 ml/min, respectively).

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralKineticsMaleMetronidazoleNitroimidazolesRandom AllocationRectumSuppositoriesTherapeutic EquivalencyTinidazoleVaginaMetronidazoleNitroimidazolesSuppositoriesTinidazole

Identifiers

PMID6870221
PMCPMC184797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.