ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1983
Genetic control of eosinophilia. Mouse strain variation in response to antigens of parasite origin.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1983. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Putative SNPs in Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 Genes Conferring Susceptibility to Natural Infection of Haemonchus Contortus in Southern Indian Sheep.Acta parasitologica · 2024Article
- Between-population differences in constitutive and infection-induced gene expression in threespine stickleback.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Immunity to the model intestinal helminth parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus.Seminars in immunopathology · 2012Review
- Article
- Article
- Genetic control of eosinophilia. Analysis of production and response to eosinophil-differentiating factor in strains of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 1989Article
- Antigen-specific T-cell lines transfer protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis in vivo.Immunology · 1986Article
- L3T4-positive T lymphoblasts are responsible for transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice.Immunology · 1985Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strain variation in capacity to develop peripheral blood eosinophilia was observed in inbred NIH and C57BL/10 (B10) mice exposed to parasite antigens by infection or by parenteral injection in Freund's complete adjuvant. NIH mice were good responders, showing rapid development of high eosinophil counts, B10 mice were low responders. The difference in response phenotype was independent of the parasite used for infection (Trichinella spiralis or Nematospiroides dubius) and of the antigen used for injection (T. spiralis larval antigen or Limulus haemocyanin). Pre-treatment of T. spiralis infected mice with low doses of cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) or restriction of the duration of infection to 7 days by anthelmintic treatment did not enhance the response of B10 mice. Thus no evidence was found that the poor response phenotype of B10 during T. spiralis infection reflected any active suppressive mechanisms developed during the adult or muscle larval phases of infection. Demonstration that eosinophilia is induced primarily by the intestinal phase allows comparison with other parameters of the immune response induced by the adult worms, namely intestinal mastocytosis and worm expulsion. From this comparison it is concluded that the low eosinophil response phenotype of B10 mice may reflect a generalized deficiency in the response of bone marrow derived precursor cells to factors of T lymphocyte origin. The significance of genetically determined variation in eosinophil responsiveness is discussed in relation to the development of protective immune or pathological responses to parasite infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
6839540PMC1536896W1544986923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.