ArticleAnnals of surgery1984
Determinants of wound infection after colon surgery.
Article in Annals of surgery, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study.The British journal of surgery · 2022Article
- A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection.Surgical infections · 2013Review
- Dip slide culture of intraoperative peritoneal irrigation fluid for prediction of septic complication in elective colorectal surgery.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1986Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over a period of 54 months, every patient undergoing colon surgery at the Hadassah University Hospital in Jerusalem was followed up prospectively by the same nurse epidemiologist. A total of 403 patients completed the analysis. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were explored in an epidemiological study, using both single and multivariate analysis. Of the 13 potential risk factors investigated, the four showing the highest association with wound infection were: the performance of more than one operation during a single admission; Arab ethnicity; the use of open drains; and the performance of a colostomy. In patients undergoing more than one operation, the risk for infection was greater if the second operation followed a surgical complication than if it was performed as an elective second procedure; whether the first operation was elective or not did not affect the infection rate. Second operations performed within 7 days of the first carried a higher risk for infection than those performed later. The different prophylactic protocols used during the period of investigation did not have an independently significant contribution to the risk of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.