ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology1984
Dendritic membrane from insect olfactory hairs: isolation method and electron microscopic observations.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetics of olfactory responses might largely depend on the odorant-receptor interaction and the odorant deactivation postulated for flux detectors.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013Review
- Pheromone transduction in moths.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2010Article
- Haloacetate analogs of pheromones: Effects on catabolism and electrophysiology inPlutella xylostella.Journal of chemical ecology · 1988Article
- Binding and hydrolysis of radiolabeled pheromone and several analogs by male-specific antennal proteins of the mothAntheraea polyphemus.Journal of chemical ecology · 1986Article
- Kinetic properties of a sex pheromone-degrading enzyme: the sensillar esterase of Antheraea polyphemus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1985Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory hairs from antennae of male saturniid moths (Antheraea polyphemus) were separated while deep-frozen by shaking antennal branches with glass beads. The hairs were collected through their differential adhesion to the surface of a petri dish. The yield, determined by the length of the isolated hair fragments, was about 38% of the estimated total hair length per antenna. The dendritic membrane was separated from the hair fragments by centrifugation through Sephadex and further purified by ultracentrifugation in sucrose buffers. Transmission electron microscopy was used to monitor the steps of the hair and membrane isolation and to investigate the membrane pellet. Some membrane vesicles bound cationized ferritin, thus indicating a negatively charged cell surface coat. Negatively stained membrane vesicles exhibited a pattern of repetitive substructures irregularly distributed over the vesicle surface. The units had a diameter of about 3 nm and a maximal density of 30,000/micron2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.