Evidence map›Paper›PMID 6518256›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1984

Separation of translational and rotational contributions in solution studies using fluorescence photobleaching recovery.

W A Wegener, R Rigler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W A Wegener
R Rigler
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HL26881NIGMS NIH HHS GM32437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) experiments are usually interpreted in terms of the translational motions of a fluorescently labeled species, rotational motions can also modulate recovery through the cosine-squared laws for dipolar absorption and emission processes. In a complex interacting system, translational and rotational contributions may both be simultaneously present. We show how these contributions can be separated in solution studies using an FPR setup in which (a) the linear polarization of the low-intensity observation beam and the high-intensity photobleaching pulse can be varied independently, and (b) all emitted fluorescent photons are counted equally. The fluorescence recovery signal obtained with the observation beam polarized at the magic angle, 54.7 degrees, from the bleach polarization direction is independent of label orientation, whereas the anisotropy function formed from a combination of parallel and perpendicular polarizations isolates the orientational recovery. The anisotropy function is identical to that in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and, for rigid-body rotational diffusion, can be expressed as a sum of five exponential terms.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSolutionsMathematicsPhotochemistrySpectrometry, FluorescenceSolutions

Identifiers

PMID6518256
PMCPMC1435107
OpenAlexW1977737089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.