Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology1984
Blood pressure in survivors of myocardial infarction. The Coronary Drug Project Research Group.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000482. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Coronary Drug Project
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The J-curve interpreted. An alternative explanation of the results.Journal of general internal medicine · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of blood pressure elevation and its associated characteristics in patients recovered from myocardial infarction was studied in the placebo group (n = 2,789) of the Coronary Drug Project. Age, relative body weight, heart rate and ST depression on the electrocardiogram were important positive correlates of hypertension measured at baseline. The relation of uric acid and elevated plasma glucose levels to increased blood pressure could be partially explained as side effects of thiazide diuretic therapy. A "high normal" baseline blood pressure best predicted the development of hypertension among survivors of myocardial infarction. Both combined systolic and diastolic hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension were adverse prognostic factors. Changes in blood pressure, including the prognostic implications of a decrease in pressure, were also analyzed in the subset of patients who sustained a recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction. Decreases in systolic (mean 7.9 mm Hg) and diastolic (mean 3.6 mm Hg) blood pressure were sustained in this subset. Patients whose blood pressure decreased after recurrent myocardial infarction tended to have higher mortality rates than those of comparable patients whose blood pressure increased or remained unchanged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.