ArticleImmunology1984
Infection of mice with Nematospiroides dubius: demonstration of neutrophil-mediated immunity in vivo in the presence of antibodies.
Article in Immunology, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Roles of Various Immune Cell Populations in Immune Response against Helminths.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Hookworm infections: Reappraising the evidence for a role of neutrophils in light of NETosis.Parasite immunology · 2022Review
- Article
- Specificity and mechanism of immunoglobulin M (IgM)- and IgG-dependent protective immunity to larval Strongyloides stercoralis in mice.Infection and immunity · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability of murine neutrophils to confer resistance to mice against infection by the helminth parasite Nematospiroides dubius has been investigated. Mice whose neutrophils had been 'altered' by an immunizing infection with third-stage larvae (L3) of N. dubius exhibited resistance to a challenge dose of L3 given 4 days after the immunizing infection, provided greater than 0.1 ml of immune mouse serum was passively transferred within 0-24 hr of challenge. Normal mouse serum was ineffective, as was immune serum given at the time of challenge to naive (unimmunized) mice. Neutrophils purified from the blood of mice infected 4 days previously were able to reduce the infectivity of exsheathed L3 when incubated with the latter in vitro in the presence of fresh immune serum. In contrast, peritoneal exudate cells collected at the same time were inactive in this test, indicating that activated macrophages capable of damaging L3 were not yet present and that the immunity of 4-day infected mice given immune serum was probably attributable to the presence of 'altered' neutrophils. The capacity of neutrophils to confer resistance to infection in vivo was unambiguously demonstrated by the passive transfer of 98 +/- 4% pure neutrophils, isolated from the blood of 4-day infected (C57Bl X BALB/c)F1 mice, to uninfected F1 mice. Only those mice which received both neutrophils and immune serum exhibited resistance to a challenge infection. In contrast, mice injected with an eosinophil-enriched cell preparation and immune serum were not resistant. These results indicate for the first time that neutrophils have the capacity to damage nematode parasites in vivo and that they are active against N. dubius in mice infected with this parasite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
6469285PMC1454725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.