Evidence map›Paper›PMID 646474›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery1978

Systemic prophylaxis with doxycycline in surgery of the colon and rectum.

H Höjer, J Wetterfors

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 1978. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current status of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients.Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 1984
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H Höjer
J Wetterfors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective double-blind study on the effects of doxycycline as a prophylactic antimicrobial in elective colonic surgery is presented. One hundred-eighteen patients were evaluated. Fifty-eight were treated and 60 were controls. Two hundred milligrams, doxycycline or placebo (two capsules) were given orally four to six hours prior to surgery and 100 mg or placebo (one capsule) for five days postoperatively. Doxycycline levels in serum and tissues were determined and related to the MICvalues of the contaminants of the operative field. A significantly lower incidence of abdominal wound sepsis, intra-abdominal complications, and septicemia was recorded in the doxycycline group compared to the control group, 12.1 and 45% respectively. The prophylactic effect was most pronounced in patients with a negative wound culture upon closure. Macroscopical peritoneal contamination was associated with less severe consequencies in the doxycycline group. Infections in the perineal field, 3/15 vs 8/17, appeared alone in the doxycycline group, whereas they were combined with abdominal sepsis in 6/8 among the controls. Treatment also reduced the incidence of repeat laparotomy due to septic complications, 0 vs 8. Thus systemic per and postoperative prophylaxis with doxycycline significantly reduced both the incidence and the severity of postoperative sepsis in potentially contaminated elective colorectal surgery without any adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentBacterial InfectionsColonDoxycyclineHumansPeritonitisPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRectumSepsisSurgical Wound InfectionDoxycycline

Identifiers

PMID646474
PMCPMC1396386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.