Evidence map›Paper›PMID 6429152›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology1984

Genetics of microtubule systems.

E C Raff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preservation Methods in Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

E C Raff

Funding

GENETIC CONTROL OF MICROTUBULE FUNCTION IN DEVELOPMENTR01HD016739 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON · PI RAFF, ELIZABETH C. · 1985 to 1995
–
NICHD NIH HHS 5R01 HD 16739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most eucaryotes the tubulin genes comprise small multigene families with approximately equal numbers of genes for alpha- and beta-tubulin, the structural proteins of microtubules. The recent isolation of tubulin mutations in several species is proving to be a powerful tool for examining the structure and function of specific sets of microtubules. In Drosophila melanogaster, genetic analysis of a testis-specific beta-tubulin gene has shown that a single tubulin gene product may fulfill a number of different microtubule functions. In addition to tubulin mutations, mutations in other genes whose products are involved in the regulation or structure of specific microtubule arrays have also been isolated. The combination of analysis of both classes of mutations is beginning to allow a molecular description of the construction and function of three-dimensional cellular structures. In addition, such studies may also shed light on the evolutionary pressures that gave rise to and serve to maintain small families of genes encoding very similar proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNADrosophila melanogasterGene Expression RegulationMacromolecular SubstancesMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMutationPhenotypeProteinsSpermatidsTestisTubulinDNAMacromolecular SubstancesMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID6429152
PMCPMC2275610
OpenAlexW2133629769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.