Evidence map›Paper›PMID 6313099›Full record

ArticleBlut1983

The effect of eosinophil chemotactic factors on in vitro eosinopoiesis in the guinea pig.

B M Czarnetzki, B Pawelzik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Blut, 1983. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B M Czarnetzki
B Pawelzik
Hautklinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influx of eosinophils to tissue sites is regulated by several well-characterized eosinophil chemotactic factors. In the present investigation the effect of such factors on eosinopoiesis was studied in guinea pig liquid bone marrow cultures. Addition of neutrophil-derived eosinophil chemotactic leukotrienes, synthetic leukotriene B4, zymosan-activated serum, purified hog C3a, C5a, C5a-des-arg, and synthetic N-formyl-methionyl-phenylalanine did not increase eosinophil numbers in marrow cultures, while supernatants of spleen or lymph node cells stimulated by concanavalin A were highly effective. 3H-thymidine labelling of cultured eosinophils was not increased by any of the added mediators. A quantitative correlation between eosinopoietic and eosinotactic activity could not be established. These in vitro data suggest therefore that eosinopoiesis and migration of guinea pig eosinophils to tissue sites are regulated by separate chemical mediators.

Indexed as

HematopoiesisAnimalsCells, CulturedChemotactic FactorsChemotactic Factors, EosinophilDipeptidesEosinophilsGuinea PigsHematopoietic Stem CellsLeukotriene B4ZymosanChemotactic FactorsChemotactic Factors, EosinophilDipeptidesLeukotriene B4N-formylmethionylphenylalanineZymosan

Identifiers

PMID6313099
OpenAlexW2020227449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.