Evidence map›Paper›PMID 6093771›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal1984

Microinjection of somatic cells with micropipettes: comparison with other transfer techniques.

J E Celis

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 1984. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bead Loading Proteins and Nucleic Acids into Adherent Human Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The many ways to cross the plasma membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1987
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J E Celis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium PhosphatesCells, CulturedDEAE-DextranErythrocyte MembraneLiposomesMacromolecular SubstancesMicroinjectionsOsmotic PressureParainfluenza Virus 1, HumanPolyethylene Glycolsalpha-tricalcium phosphatecalcium phosphatecalcium phosphate, dibasic, anhydrouscalcium phosphate, monobasic, anhydrousCalcium PhosphatesDEAE-DextranLiposomesMacromolecular SubstancesPolyethylene Glycolstetracalcium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID6093771
PMCPMC1144298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.