Evidence map›Paper›PMID 570458›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research1979

The mechanism of microtubule associated cytoplasmic transport. Isolation and preliminary characterisation of a microtubule transport system.

J S Hyams, H Stebbings

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 1979. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of microtubules in the differentiation of ovarian follicles during vitellogenesis inDrosophila.Roux's archives of developmental biology : the official organ of the EDBO · 1986
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S Hyams
H Stebbings
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutritive tubes of telotrophic insect ovaries are cytoplasmic channels along which ribosomes are transported over distances of several mm from trophic cells to the developing oocytes. The presence within the nutritive tubes of a massive number of orientated microtubules renders them strongly birefringent in polarised light, a property which, together with their size, rendered them amenable to isolation by microdissection. Ultrastructurally the isolated tubes were indistinguishable from undissected controls. Polyacrylamide gels revealed a consistent pattern of some 30 bands of which tubulin was the most prominent. The tubes also contained a band which comigrated with the major high molecular weight microtubule associated protein (MAP) from mouse brain but no detectable actin, myosin or dynein. Microtubules in the isolated tubes were not depolymerised by treatments (cold, calcium and colchicine) which typically disrupt cytoplasmic microtubules. Following extraction of the membrane enclosing the tubes and the cytoplasmic matrix the microtubule cytoskeleton persisted, retaining its cylindrical organisation although no bridges between the microtubules were detected in the electron microscope. The possibility that the stability and spatial deployment of the nutritive tube microtubules is conferred by specific microtubule accessory proteins is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCalciumCell FractionationColchicineCold TemperatureFemaleHemipteraMicrotubulesOvaryProteinsTubulinCalciumColchicineProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID570458
OpenAlexW2316859527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.