Evidence map›Paper›PMID 43024101›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2026

Migraine: translational challenges, novel therapies and disease modification.

Leah Mistry, Alexandre Mathy, Anish Bahra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah MistryKeble College, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PG, UK.
Alexandre MathyNeurosciences Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Anish BahraNeurosciences Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. a.bahra@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-9006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is the most common neurological disorder, which after stroke confers the greatest neurological disability in the working population. As with other disorders of brain function, pathophysiological processes are more difficult to delineate, notwithstanding the biological complexities and clinical heterogeneity of the disorder. The current review will outline the framework upon which mechanistic pathways have been predicated. It will examine bench to bedside models: what we have learned from those which have been unsuccessful and address those which have borne fruit, presenting the clinical and exploratory insights gained. In the second part the more recent successes in drug therapeutics are summarised, from clinical trials to real world observations and limitations. With this in sight, the third part emphasises the need to reframe goals towards longer-term disease modification, addressing the impact of confounding comorbidities and moving towards a biopsychosocial model of pain.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansBiopsychosocialCGRP treatmentsChronic migraineChronic painDisease modificationPathophysiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.