Evidence map›Paper›PMID 43022242›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Neurocognition of dance: Guidelines for using dance as model behavior and research subject in cognitive neuroscience.

Vasiliki Meletaki, Julia F Christensen, Kohinoor M Darda, Laura Rai, Andrea Orlandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasiliki MeletakiPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Julia F ChristensenDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kohinoor M DardaAdvancement and Research in the Sciences and Arts (ARISA) Foundation, Pune, India.
Laura RaiSchool of Allied Health and Life Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Andrea OrlandiSocial Brain Sciences Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dance and movement science bridges cognitive psychology, neuroscience, cultural studies, philosophical aesthetics, and the performing arts. The field has evolved significantly, examining physical, social, psychological, and neural aspects of dance and movement execution and perception, contributing to a deeper understanding of human cognition and of dance itself. As the field expands, shared guidelines that support methodological rigor, reproducibility, and cultural relevance are of paramount importance. This paper synthesizes current research and introduces a comprehensive seven-principle research design framework for using dance in cognitive neuroscience. Key elements include the operationalization of "dance" in empirical sciences, the definition of who is a dancer, measures of expertise, and the importance of a culturally sensitive, holistic, and interdisciplinary approach to its investigation in the laboratory and in ecologically valid settings. This framework benefits research in dance and movement aesthetics, as well as investigations in social cognition, affective neuroscience, computer science, and artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

dancedance expertiseecological validityempirical aestheticsguidelinesneuroaestheticsreplicabilityreproducibilityresearch designwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID43022242
PMCPMC13755982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.