Evidence map›Paper›PMID 43021380›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2026

Disentangling the role of adaptive immunity in Alzheimer's disease.

Marco Zattoni, Ludwig Aigner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco ZattoniInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8517-2439
Ludwig AignerInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. ludwig.aigner@pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-8046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorder, is characterized by progressive synaptic and neuronal loss, amyloid-β deposition, hyperphosphorylated tau accumulation, and chronic neuroinflammation, traditionally attributed primarily to the innate immune system. Increasing evidence, however, implicates the adaptive immune system as an active contributor to AD pathogenesis and progression. This emerging perspective has stimulated the development of immunomodulatory strategies aimed at mitigating cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks of the disease. In this review, we examine how adaptive immune responses change throughout the course of AD, integrating findings from both human studies and animal models while emphasizing the temporal dynamics of these alterations. We critically evaluate areas of consensus and controversy in the field, highlighting how differences in experimental models, disease stages, and methodological approaches contribute to divergent findings. Finally, we assess current therapeutic strategies targeting adaptive immunity, discussing their potential mechanisms of action and identifying key therapeutic windows and routes of administration that may maximize efficacy. By providing a comprehensive overview of adaptive immune involvement in AD, this review aims to inform the development of more precise and effective immunomodulatory interventions.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsHumansImmunity, Innate

Identifiers

PMID43021380
PMCPMC13760774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.