ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026
Precision Neurology in Alzheimer's Disease: Genomics to Drug Optimization for Effective Therapeutic Intervention.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits high clinical and biological heterogeneity, which complicates the development of one-size-fits-all therapeutic strategies. Standard trial designs can mask subgroup-specific effects, highlighting the need to move towards precision neurology entailing multisystem genomics, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence (AI) integrative signals. The aim of the study is to critically synthesize and evaluate emerging strategies for drug optimization and individual therapeutic algorithms informed by genomic architecture, pharmacogenomics (PGx), and polygenic risk scores (PRS) with the opinion to resolve the controversy and unanswered question. Amplify the convergence into amyloid processing, lipid metabolism, and innate immunity seen from monogenic mutations and over 80 GWAS risk loci. Genotyping of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variants permits pharmacogenomic stratifications for the optimization of cholinesterase inhibitor and psychotropic dosing, thereby reducing adverse events. Variants of the alleles APOE ε4 and immune-related factors (e.g., FCGR3A) are significant in predicting the effects of ARIA associated with amyloid on anti-amyloid immunotherapy outcomes. PRS and deep phenotyping (including digital and fluid-based biomarkers) allow for the identification of unique biological endotypes (e.g., tau-dominant vs. vascular-inflammatory) that improve clinical trial enrichment and prognostication. This framework delineates molecular endotypes and translates CYP2D6 or APOE stratification into drug dosing and ARIA risk predictions. These biomarker-driven strategies shift AD management from a passive, reactive therapeutic scheme to an active, personalized one. Utilization of high-dimensional data streams via AI-driven learning health systems converts AD management from a reactive, symptom-based model to that which is proactive and hallmark biomarker-driven precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
43018845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.