ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Tumor-associated macrophage reprogramming in cancer: recent advances in resistance mechanisms and therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are abundant, heterogeneous, and spatially organized immune cells that regulate cancer progression, immune evasion, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Single-cell and spatial technologies have revealed diverse TAM states shaped by ontogeny, tumor type, disease stage, cytokines, hypoxia, metabolism, epigenetic remodeling, extracellular matrix architecture, stromal interactions, extracellular vesicles, microbiome-derived signals, and therapy-induced damage. Bidirectional cancer-TAM crosstalk evolves from tumor initiation through progression and recurrence, generating tumor-specific resistance programs that suppress lymphocytes, impair antigen presentation and phagocytosis, promote angiogenesis and metabolic restriction, remodel stroma, mediate tolerogenic efferocytosis, and sustain stem-cell, metastatic, dormancy, and regenerative niches. Therapeutic strategies include blocking macrophage recruitment or survival, activating CD40/TLR/STING signaling, targeting PI3Kγ and STAT pathways, restoring phagocytosis, modulating efferocytosis, and applying metabolic, epigenetic, stromal, vascular, nanoparticle, RNA-based, microbiome-directed, and engineered-macrophage approaches. Randomized trials have established the efficacy of CSF1R inhibition in selected CSF1-driven, macrophage-dependent tumors, whereas most other TAM- or myeloid-directed strategies in conventional solid tumors have demonstrated only preliminary clinical activity or pharmacodynamic modulation without consistent durable benefit. Off-target toxicity, spatial heterogeneity, dynamic plasticity, preclinical-clinical discordance, and combination-treatment optimization remain major barriers. Biomarker-guided patient selection, longitudinal monitoring, tumor-specific targeting, and rationally sequenced combinations will be essential for converting tumor-supportive TAMs into durable antitumor effectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.