ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Label-free comparative proteomic analysis reveals distinct profiles of direct oral anticoagulants in human endothelial cells.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-line treatment for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clinical and preclinical studies suggest that, beyond their anticoagulant properties, DOACs may have additional vascular effects. However, their effects on endothelial protein-abundance profiles remain incompletely characterized. The objective of this study was to explore the protein-abundance profiles associated with exposure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to each of the four DOACs in the absence of external stimuli, using a label-free quantification (LFQ) methodology. Methods: Cultured HUVECs were exposed for 6 h to concentrations selected to approximate reported therapeutic plasma concentrations of apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran. All experiments were carried out in serum-free media, after a starvation period of 18 h. After protein extraction using the TRIzol Reagent, label-free quantitative proteomic analysis was performed using nanoLC-MS/MS, followed by the identification of differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) and bioinformatic enrichment analyses. Results: We identified 1,643 protein entries, of which 753 were differentially abundant. Of these, 32 showed higher abundance and 26 showed lower abundance than the vehicle control in all four DOAC comparisons. Proteins showing shared abundance changes were mapped to gene identifiers that were enriched for annotations related to autophagy and cardiac development, and cellular activation. Several proteins showing abundance changes in all three FXa-inhibitor comparisons, but not in the dabigatran comparison, were mapped to annotations related to hypoxia response, vascular permeability, and cholesterol homeostasis. However, this comparison is potentially confounded by the absence of an HCl-matched vehicle control for dabigatran. The majority of DAPs were drug specific, with distinct signatures for each DOAC. Exploratory enrichment subnetworks linked mapped gene identifiers from drug specific protein sets to ontology terms including endothelial-cell chemotaxis, sodium-ion transport, necrotic cell death, mRNA splicing, and regulation of gene expression. These cellular functions were not directly measured. Conclusion: Under the experimental conditions used, exposure to the four DOACs was associated with common and drug-specific protein-abundance patterns in HUVECs. These protein-abundance patterns provide hypothesis-generating observations for subsequent functional investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.