ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Context-dependent pharmacological effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in breast cancer from molecular mechanisms to clinical safety.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become cornerstone therapeutics for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, but their impact on breast cancer remains uncertain. Preclinical studies show context-dependent effects of GLP-1 RAs on breast-cancer cells. Direct evidence from breast-cancer models supports a pro-proliferative NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4)/reactive oxygen species (ROS) /VEGF pathway under supra-pharmacological exposure, whereas PI3K/Akt-mediated pro-survival signaling and cAMP/PKA/CREB-driven proliferation remain inferred from non-breast systems and require direct confirmation. Under obesity- and insulin-resistant conditions, indirect antitumor effects may occur through improved insulin sensitivity, altered adipokines, and remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials do not show a significant increase in breast-cancer risk (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76-1.26), while some large observational cohorts report small risk differences that are susceptible to confounding and detection bias. Evidence for inter-agent differences is observational and limited by the absence of head-to-head randomized oncological comparisons. This narrative review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence across three dimensions, namely, molecular subtype, drug exposure, and host metabolic status, and distinguishes direct breast-cancer evidence from mechanistic extrapolation. We outline evidence-informed clinical considerations and research priorities rather than definitive recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.