Evidence map›Paper›PMID 43013116›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2026

Differential effects of pea protein isolate, pea protein concentrate, and whey protein isolate supplementation on gut microbiota and metabolic markers in healthy adults: a 3-arm parallel randomised intervention.

Annalena Kamm, Samira Prado, Katharina Dannenberg, Dirk Repsilber, Tatiana M Marques, Robert J Brummer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611138 (Växtbaserade Proteiners påverkan på tarmhälsa Hos människa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611138 nacompletednot on this map

Växtbaserade Proteiners påverkan på tarmhälsa Hos människa

TypeinterventionalSponsorÖrebro University, SwedenRan2022 to 2023Enrolled59ConditionsHealthyArmsProtein supplementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annalena KammSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. annalena.kamm@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9389-4172
Samira PradoSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. samira.prado@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-6291
Katharina DannenbergSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Dirk RepsilberSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Tatiana M MarquesSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Robert J BrummerSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs origin and quality of dietary protein are key modulators of gut microbiota and host metabolism, characterising health effects of different proteins is increasingly important given the need to shift towards more plant-based protein sources for environmental sustainability. Yet, direct comparisons across protein sources and food matrices in humans remain limited. This randomised, double-blind, 3-arm parallel, dietary intervention study examined the effects of four-week pea protein concentrate (PPC), pea protein isolate (PPI) or whey protein isolate (WPI) supplementation (0.5 g/kg body mass/day) on gut microbiota composition in healthy adults as the main outcome.

methodsFaecal samples and lifestyle questionnaires were collected weekly, with fasting blood and 24-h urine samples obtained at baseline, mid- and post-intervention. Proteins were compared using two contrasts - PPC vs. PPI and PPI vs. WPI - investigating differences between plant and animal-based proteins as well as between plant-based proteins with different matrixes.

resultsSupplementation of PPC and PPI significantly reduced α-diversity and increased β-diversity, partly modulated by BMI. At species level, relative abundances of Anaerobutyricum hallii and Bifidobacterium longum increased significantly in subjects consuming PPC. A similar result was observed for Lactobacillus crispatus and Limosilactobacillus frumenti in subjects consuming PPI.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that different dietary proteins selectively modulate beneficial gut microbial species, highlighting the importance of investigating individual responses to dietary interventions. Further studies are needed to verify how compositional changes translate into changes in microbial functionality.

trial registrationThis study is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT05611138 (November 02, 2022).

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomePea ProteinsWhey ProteinsAdultBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkersPea ProteinsWhey ProteinsAnaerobutyricum halliiBifidobacterium longumDietary interventionDietary proteinsLactobacillus crispatusLimosilactobacillus frumenti

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.