ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Recent advances in coronary in-stent restenosis: a comprehensive narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention despite the use of drug-eluting stents. ISR is a heterogeneous process driven by neointimal hyperplasia, neoatherosclerosis, and mechanical factors such as stent underexpansion or fracture. Intravascular imaging, particularly IVUS and OCT, enables mechanism-guided lesion preparation and device selection, while metabolomics, molecular imaging, and circulating biomarkers are improving understanding of its biological heterogeneity. Adequate lesion preparation is fundamental, and drug-coated balloons and repeat drug-eluting stent implantation remain the principal treatment strategies. Adjunctive techniques such as intravascular lithotripsy may help in severely calcified or resistant underexpanded lesions. Emerging evidence also implicates sphingolipid metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction, immune-inflammatory signaling, and systemic metabolic modulation in ISR, though clinical relevance requires validation. This review summarizes recent advances in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ISR, emphasizing the shift from anatomy-based management toward mechanism-guided, individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.