ReviewEndocrine2026
GLP-1 receptor agonists for people with type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease: reducing uncertainty in clinical practice.
Review in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) may be the most frequent first manifestation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Management of PAD in T2D aims to improve symptoms and lower the high risk of major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and limb (MALE) events. Drugs commonly used are lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medicines, antithrombotic and antihyperglycemic agents. The ADA recommends both GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) as the first-line therapy to reduce the cardio-renal risk in people with T2D, including those with PAD. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that semaglutide is better than placebo in reducing by 30% PAD events in people with T2D (with or without PAD at baseline), although no RCT was designed to investigate PAD-related hard outcomes as a primary endpoint; however, both liraglutide and semaglutide may increase walking distance by approximately 25-30 m at six months in people with T2D and PAD. Cohort studies also confirm that GLP-1RA use is better than non-use in reducing by 28% the risk of MALE in individuals with T2D and PAD, although their retrospective design might introduce residual confounding and under-ascertainment of outcomes. Dedicated RCTs will obtain more direct evidence for the promising lower limb benefits of GLP-1RAs, but the scientific outlook of specific RCTs on hard limb events is empty. In the meantime, clinicians should choose a GLP-1RA of proven efficacy in subjects with T2D and PAD to improve their cardio-nephro-metabolic outlook, as well as their walking capacity, limited at present to liraglutide and semaglutide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
43007383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.