ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
Association between glycemic variability and delirium in critically ill older adults patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium affects 30-70% of critically ill older adults patients and is associated with poor outcomes. While glycemic control is essential in intensive care, the impact of glycemic variability (GV) on delirium remains understudied, particularly in older adults patients. This study investigated the association between GV and delirium in critically ill older adults patients.
methodsWe analyzed 16,335 patients aged ≥ 65 years from the MIMIC-IV database. GV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of blood glucose measurements and categorized into quartiles. Delirium was assessed using Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the association between GV and delirium, adjusting for demographics, clinical parameters, and comorbidities. We assessed the added predictive value of GV using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Random forest and Boruta algorithm determined variable importance.
resultsDelirium incidence increased across GV quartiles (28.7% in Q1 vs. 41.8% in Q4, p < 0.001). After full adjustment, the highest GV quartile showed 42% higher delirium risk compared to the lowest (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71, p = 0.003), with a significant dose-response relationship. Random forest and Boruta algorithm identified GV as the most important predictor of delirium. Adding GV to prediction models significantly improved risk reclassification, with significant NRI in the fully adjusted model (p = 0.01) and significant IDIs across all models (all p < 0.05). The association remained consistent across all subgroups regardless of diabetes status.
conclusionsHigher GV independently predicts increased delirium risk in critically ill older adults patients. Monitoring and managing GV may represent a modifiable target for delirium prevention in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.