Evidence map›Paper›PMID 43002207›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2026

Guiding Inpatient Glycemic Management with Continuous Glucose Monitoring. A Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Cohort Study.

Alhely Gaytan-Santillan, Adrian Soto-Mota, Daniel Cuevas-Ramos, Roopa Mehta, Alfonso Gulias-Herrero

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05096858 (Assessment of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitorization on Glycemic Variability and Insulin's Prescription in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05096858 unknown statusnot on this map

Assessment of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitorization on Glycemic Variability and Insulin's Prescription in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador ZubiranRan2020 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Covid19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alhely Gaytan-SantillanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Adrian Soto-MotaMetabolic Diseases Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Daniel Cuevas-RamosDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roopa MehtaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alfonso Gulias-HerreroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. alfonso.guliash@incmnsz.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-6803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a cornerstone of ambulatory diabetes management, and its utility in the inpatient setting remains underexplored. This study evaluated a CGM-guided management strategy against point-of-care capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring in adults who were hospitalized with hyperglycemia.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, nonrandomized comparative cohort study, reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, at a national referral center in Mexico City. A total of 338 adult inpatients with hyperglycemia were allocated to either the CGM group (n = 169) or the standard CBG monitoring group(n = 169). The primary outcome was the percentage of glucose readings between 70 and 180 mg/dL, measured with intermittently scanned CGM in the CGM group and with a four-point daily capillary schedule at 06:00, 12:00, 18:00, and 24:00 in the CBG group.

resultsThe capillary schedule yielded 6123 of 7024 scheduled measurements (87.2% capture), including 1431 at 24:00. Readings in range averaged 54.9% by CGM and 57.8% by CBG, based on approximately 96 and 4 daily measurements per patient, respectively. CBG at 24:00 was 27.0 mg/dL lower than the same patient daytime mean (95% CI, 20.9-33.0 lower; p < 0.001), with 79.2% of midnight readings in range versus 52.4% during the day. Hypoglycemia was distributed across the whole day, with 19.9% of CBG readings below 70 mg/dL recorded at 24:00, and seven patients had hypoglycemia detected only overnight. Time below 70 mg/dL was 10.5% by CGM and 5.6% by CBG; whereas, below 54 mg/dL was 3.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Mean glucose and the coefficient of variation improved from the first to the second half of hospitalization in both groups.

conclusionsThe two groups recorded a similar percentage of readings in range, however, the sensor detected hypoglycemia twice as often. One in five capillary readings below 70 mg/dL was recorded at 24:00, and a daytime-only schedule would have missed all of them, as well as the hypoglycemia documented overnight in seven patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05096858. Enrollment began on 13 April 2020 and the record was first posted on 27 October 2021, hence, the study was in part retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Continuous glucose monitoringGlycemic variabilityHospital careHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaInsulin therapyTime in range

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.