ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027
Exploratory machine-learning evaluation of clinical and dosimetric features in late prostate radiotherapy toxicity.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prediction of late radiotherapy toxicity remains challenging, as routinely available clinical and dosimetric variables may incompletely capture individual radiosensitivity. This study evaluated interpretable machine-learning models for predicting baseline- corrected late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity following prostate radiotherapy and examined model-derived feature contributions. Methods: Data from 229 men with prostate cancer enrolled in the REQUITE cohort were retrospectively analysed. Late toxicity was defined as an increase of ≥1 CTCAE grade from baseline occurring ≥12 months following radiotherapy. Prespecified clinical and dosimetric predictors were evaluated separately for GI and GU toxicity, with correlated dose-volume parameters represented using organ-specific equivalent uniform dose (EUD). L1-regularised logistic regression, Elastic Net and XGBoost were evaluated using repeated nested stratified cross-validation. Performance was assessed using out-of-fold predictions, bootstrap confidence intervals and outcome-label permutation testing. SHAP analysis assessed feature contributions and stability across repeats. Results: GI and GU toxicity worsening occurred in 107 (46.7%) and 125 (54.6%) patients, respectively. GI ROC-AUCs were 0.573, 0.571 and 0.587 for L1, Elastic Net and XGBoost, respectively, with permutation testing indicating above-chance discrimination ( Conclusion: Routine clinical and dosimetric variables provided limited predictive information for late GI toxicity but did not reliably discriminate GU toxicity. The findings support investigation of additional dosimetric and biological markers for toxicity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.