Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42999685›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027

Exploratory machine-learning evaluation of clinical and dosimetric features in late prostate radiotherapy toxicity.

Karl Jordan, Christopher J Talbot, John D Kelleher, Fiona Lyng, Aidan D Meade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karl JordanSchool of Physics, Clinical & Optometric Sciences, Central Quad, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Grangegorman, Ireland.
Christopher J TalbotDivision of Genetics and Genome Biology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
John D KelleherADAPT Research Centre, School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona LyngCentre for Radiation and Environmental Science, Physical to Life Sciences Research Hub, Technological University, Dublin, Ireland.
Aidan D MeadeSchool of Physics, Clinical & Optometric Sciences, Central Quad, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Grangegorman, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prediction of late radiotherapy toxicity remains challenging, as routinely available clinical and dosimetric variables may incompletely capture individual radiosensitivity. This study evaluated interpretable machine-learning models for predicting baseline- corrected late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity following prostate radiotherapy and examined model-derived feature contributions. Methods: Data from 229 men with prostate cancer enrolled in the REQUITE cohort were retrospectively analysed. Late toxicity was defined as an increase of ≥1 CTCAE grade from baseline occurring ≥12 months following radiotherapy. Prespecified clinical and dosimetric predictors were evaluated separately for GI and GU toxicity, with correlated dose-volume parameters represented using organ-specific equivalent uniform dose (EUD). L1-regularised logistic regression, Elastic Net and XGBoost were evaluated using repeated nested stratified cross-validation. Performance was assessed using out-of-fold predictions, bootstrap confidence intervals and outcome-label permutation testing. SHAP analysis assessed feature contributions and stability across repeats. Results: GI and GU toxicity worsening occurred in 107 (46.7%) and 125 (54.6%) patients, respectively. GI ROC-AUCs were 0.573, 0.571 and 0.587 for L1, Elastic Net and XGBoost, respectively, with permutation testing indicating above-chance discrimination ( Conclusion: Routine clinical and dosimetric variables provided limited predictive information for late GI toxicity but did not reliably discriminate GU toxicity. The findings support investigation of additional dosimetric and biological markers for toxicity prediction.

Indexed as

Explainable AIMachine learningProstate cancerRadiotherapy toxicitySHAP

Identifiers

PMID42999685
PMCPMC13744349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.