ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Microbiota-targeted interventions in chronic kidney disease: probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and traditional Chinese medicine.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is tightly associated with gut dysbiosis that fuels uremic toxin buildup, systemic inflammation, and renal fibrosis, yet conventional CKD therapies offer limited disease-modifying choices. This narrative review integrates preclinical and clinical evidence (searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane up to May 31, 2026) for gut-microbiota interventions, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and compares their efficacy via network meta-analyses stratified by CKD stages. All microecological agents remodel gut flora, boost short-chain fatty acid producers and strengthen intestinal barriers to cut protein-bound uremic toxins, but eGFR benefits vary by strain, formulation, and disease stage, with most robust effects in non-dialysis CKD (stages 3-4). Dialysis patients gain minimal renal improvements, only mild anti-inflammatory and gastrointestinal relief. Network meta-analyses indicate distinct therapeutic strengths of each regimen, yet indirect cross-study comparisons yield low-to-moderate evidence certainty without direct head-to-head trials. FMT and herbal TCM show promising renoprotective gut-kidney regulatory effects in animal research and small preliminary human cohorts, though large controlled human trials remain absent. Subtype-specific CKD responses (diabetic nephropathy, IgA nephropathy) cannot be universally extrapolated. Despite encouraging mechanistic and early clinical signals, standardized testing, comparative trials and strict safety monitoring for fragile CKD patients are required before routine guideline use of gut-targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.