ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2026
China's Clean Heating Policy and Effects on Blood Pressure in Rural Beijing Adults.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale residential energy transitions from solid fuel to clean energy are promising strategies to mitigate climate change and improve population health, but rigorous evaluation of their impacts is rare. China's Clean Heating Policy (CHP) aimed to transition tens of millions of households from coal to electric and gas-based space heating. Following evidence of policy-driven improvements in indoor air pollution and indoor temperature, we evaluated the CHP's impact on blood pressure (BP). In winter 2018-2019, we enrolled 1,003 adults aged >40 years from 50 Beijing villages not yet treated by the CHP; 20 villages were treated during follow-up (winters 2019-2020 and 2021-2022). Brachial and central BP and covariates were measured during household visits by trained staff. Policy impacts were estimated using an extended two-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences approach with village-clustered standard errors and adjustment for key BP predictors to improve precision. We found evidence of reductions (in mmHg) in brachial systolic BP (-1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.3, 0.5), central systolic BP (-1.5, 95% CI: -3.3, 0.4), brachial diastolic BP (-1.6, 95% CI: -2.9, -0.3), and central diastolic BP (-1.6, 95% CI: -2.9, -0.3) among villages treated by the CHP compared with those untreated. Treatment effects varied by the year villages were treated by the CHP (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.