Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42996922›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Development and internal validation of a nomogram incorporating C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio for predicting esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early esophageal neoplasia.

Mengqiu Tang, Chen Wang, Yang Zhou, Tian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengqiu TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yang ZhouDepartment of Ningbo Institute of Innovation for Combined Medicine and Engineering, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Tian ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-600X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal neoplasia may cause strictures that impair eating and quality of life. Existing models rely on anatomical factors; the value of inflammatory-nutritional markers like the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) remains unclear. We aimed to develop and internally validate a CAR-based nomogram for post-ESD stricture. Methods: This retrospective single-center study (2015-2024) included consecutive ESD patients with early esophageal neoplasia, excluding those with additional therapy, multiple lesions, comorbidities, recent infections, steroids, or loss to follow-up. Stricture: dysphagia or inability to pass a 9.8-mm scope within 12 months. CAR = preoperative C-reactive protein / albumin. The model was developed on the full cohort and internally validated via 1,000 bootstrap resamples (optimism-corrected). Logistic regression built the nomogram. Performance: area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity/specificity, calibration (Brier), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Of 111 patients, 36 (32.4%) developed stricture. Independent predictors were infiltration depth (< M2 Conclusions: CAR independently predicts post-ESD stricture. The nomogram is a promising preliminary risk-stratification tool, but requires external validation before its routine clinical use.

Indexed as

C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR)early esophageal neoplasiaendoscopic submucosal dissectionesophageal stricturenomogram model

Identifiers

PMID42996922
PMCPMC13740736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.