ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
The vascular-immune interface in breast cancer: normalization strategies, combination therapy, and biomarkers.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in selected patients with breast cancer, particularly those with triple-negative disease, but most tumors remain refractory. Abnormal tumor vasculature is one contributor to this resistance. Disorganized, hyperpermeable vessels produce heterogeneous perfusion, hypoxia, acidosis, and elevated interstitial pressure; these changes impede drug delivery and lymphocyte trafficking while favoring regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and dysfunctional antigen presentation. Anti-angiogenic therapy can transiently reverse part of this phenotype. When dose and timing are appropriate, a vascular-normalization window improves perfusion and oxygenation, restores endothelial adhesiveness, and creates conditions in which chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade may work more effectively. This framework is biologically compelling, but clinical evidence in breast cancer remains uneven: activity has been reported in several early-phase combination studies, whereas large trials of bevacizumab-containing regimens have not consistently improved overall survival. Candidate biomarkers-including VEGF/VEGFR signaling, angiopoietin-Tie2 activity, PD-L1, high endothelial venules, tertiary lymphoid structures, circulating cytokines, and spatial patterns of immune exclusion-remain exploratory and are limited by assay variability and temporal heterogeneity. This narrative review examines the vascular - immune interface across breast cancer subtypes, distinguishes mechanistic rationale from clinical proof, and identifies priorities for biomarker-guided trials designed to define dose, sequence, and the normalization window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.