ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Repositioning community-based mental health care for people with psychosocial disabilities: a physical health equity-oriented whole-health recovery framework.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based mental health care has expanded identification, treatment, continuity of care, and rehabilitation for people with psychosocial disabilities, yet physical health, functional capacity, and social participation remain insufficiently integrated into routine support. This Perspective proposes a physical health equity-oriented whole-health recovery framework that builds on existing community mental health services. The framework follows a single service logic in which routine contact identifies physical, functional, and participation needs; needs and support assessment considers clinical status, functional limitations, social barriers, preferences, and available resources; and needs-matched support facilitates participation, adaptation, and continued engagement. Its distinctive proposition is that disproportionate loss among people facing greater health or participation barriers should trigger further assessment, adaptation, or support with identifiable service responsibility. Equity is therefore examined across identification, assessment, matching, participation, retention, and benefit. Supported community participation provides one means of translating identified needs into everyday community life, with social prescribing representing one possible implementation mechanism. The proposed sequence is intended as a testable service proposition rather than a validated universal pathway, and its implementation should be examined across different service and policy contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.