ReviewCureus2026
Stress Fractures in Military Recruits: Current Concepts, Risk Stratification, Prevention, Evidence-Based Management, and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress fracture is a major cause of morbidity, training loss, retarded graduation, and military loss in recruits where there is an abrupt increase in repetitive mechanical loading. This narrative review synthesized up-to-date data on mechanobiology, risk factors, risk stratification, clinical signs and symptoms, diagnosis, prevention, management, rehabilitation, return to duty, and future directions for stress fracture in military populations. A literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar identified 35 English-language studies used in the final narrative synthesis. Existing data indicate a load-capacity model involving dynamic relationships among external mechanical dose, local skeletal strain, and biological repair capacity. Factors contributing to susceptibility are a history of stress fracture, being female, age, menstrual malfunction, pre-entry conditioning, poor body composition, lack of vitamin D, exposure to medication, and site-specific biomechanics. In cases of negative radiographs and a high rate of clinical suspicion, such as activity-related and localized early symptoms, advanced imaging, including MRI, is the choice. Implement site-specific management, with greater protection and surgical attention for high-risk fractures. Rehabilitation should depend on pain-free work, strength recovery, progressive exposure to impact, and signs of healing rather than time. Prevention should focus on pre-entry conditioning, gradual training loads, adequate rest, adequate nutrition, and early symptom reporting. Future studies should test dynamic prediction models that integrate skeletal imaging, load measures from wearables, and known fracture outcomes to inform prevention and safe return to military service at the individual level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.