ReviewJournal of extracellular vesicles2026
Extracellular Vesicles for Space Biomedical Research.
Review in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are regulated, information-rich nanovesicles that reflect aspects of parent-cell state, making them promising readouts on biological adaptation. Microgravity perturbs mechanotransduction, mitochondrial stress and quality control, and autophagy-endolysosomal trafficking, processes that can reshape EV biogenesis and cargo selection. However, spaceflight EV studies remain sparse and methodologically inconsistent, complicating mechanistic interpretation and cross-mission comparison. In this review, we define an EV-centred framework that links microgravity-sensitive changes in cytoskeletal tension, membrane trafficking, mitochondrial quality control, and autophagy-endolysosomal routing to four measurable EV outputs: concentration, subtype balance, surface phenotype, and molecular cargo. We use this framework to organize current evidence from spaceflight and simulated microgravity studies, while considering the limitations introduced by heterogeneous isolation and characterization methods. We then examine microgravity-relevant EV culture systems, including high-density three-dimensional tissues, organoids, spheroids, and perfused tissue chips that support serial collection of conditioned media or effluent, together with compact capture and concentration approaches and core characterization strategies. Finally, we discuss the potential use of EVs as longitudinal liquid-biopsy readouts of stress and aging-like trajectories, as regenerative products relevant to musculoskeletal, vascular, and immune risks, and as engineered delivery vehicles. We identify EV uptake and biodistribution under altered gravity as a major translational gap and emphasize the need for standardized workflows that improve experimental rigor and biological interpretation in spaceflight research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.