ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026
Bempedoic Acid in Statin-Intolerant Patients: Real-World Implementation Strategies, Cardiovascular Outcomes Beyond the CLEAR Trial, and Combination Therapy Approaches.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewStatin intolerance remains a significant barrier to achieving lipid goals and reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Bempedoic acid (BA), an oral ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor activated predominantly in the liver, offers a non-statin lipid-lowering option with a low propensity for muscle-related adverse effects. This review seeks to discuss BA use in real-world practice. RECENT
findingsThis review summarizes BA pharmacology, cardiovascular outcomes, safety, combination strategies, and real-world implementation in individuals who are either statin intolerant or unwilling to take statins. The CLEAR clinical trial series established BA's lipid-lowering effect and safety profile, culminating in CLEAR Outcomes, which further demonstrated fewer major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with established ASCVD or at high cardiovascular risk. Although these findings are compelling, they are limited to this population, and the impact in low- to borderline-risk populations remains unclear. In practice, clinicians should assess the potential contribution of the nocebo effect, distinguish partial versus complete statin intolerance, preserve any tolerated statin exposure, define the residual lipid-lowering gap, and align treatment intensity with cardiovascular risk and patient preferences. BA may then be considered within a guideline-directed framework that accounts for treatment access, tolerability, and shared decision-making. Combination therapy with BA and ezetimibe represents a practical oral option, whereas PCSK9-targeted therapy may be preferred when the gap to lipid goals is sufficiently large or the patient is at high ASCVD risk. Clinicians should also provide risk-based counseling and monitoring for potential adverse effects, including hyperuricemia, gout, and tendon injury. Overall, BA represents a valuable addition to the lipid-lowering armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.