Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42985470›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Miro Asadourian, John A Ambrose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miro AsadourianDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, UCSF-Fresno, Fresno, CA 93701-2302, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-4891
John A AmbroseDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, UCSF-Fresno, Fresno, CA 93701-2302, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7329-8167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is the most common acute coronary syndrome presentation and represents a heterogeneous clinical entity with distinct mechanisms and distinct diagnostic and therapeutic implications. This narrative review summarizes contemporary concepts in NSTEMI pathophysiology, classification, angiographic phenotypes, and treatment strategies, with an emphasis on differentiating Type 1 from Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) and the implications for revascularization decisions. The PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for English-language publications addressing NSTEMI pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, and management, supplemented by the most recent American and European acute coronary syndrome guidelines, the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, landmark randomized controlled trials, and pivotal mechanistic and intravascular imaging studies, with priority given to contemporary and high-impact sources. NSTEMI emerges as a heterogeneous syndrome rather than a single disease, and optimal care depends on identifying the underlying mechanism. This requires distinguishing myocardial infarction from myocardial injury, separating Type 1 atherothrombosis from Type 2 supply-demand mismatch, and recognizing entities such as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. A mechanism-specific approach should guide antithrombotic therapy and revascularization decisions, and the transition from a syndromic label to an individualized, mechanism-based diagnosis is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

NSTEMIrevascularizationType 1 MIType 2 MI

Identifiers

PMID42985470
PMCPMC13732693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.