ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026
Metabolic Syndrome Among Inpatients With Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Clinical Correlates.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major physical comorbidity in schizophrenia and is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and poor prognosis. This study investigated the prevalence of MetS and its clinical correlates among Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia, with particular attention to the metabolic-risk profiles of antipsychotic regimens. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study included 1024 inpatients with schizophrenia from two tertiary psychiatric hospitals in Central China. MetS was diagnosed according to the criteria of the Chinese Diabetes Society. Sociodemographic, clinical, medication, physical examination, and laboratory data were collected. Antipsychotic regimens were classified as non-high-risk, high-risk, or high-risk-plus-low-risk combinations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with MetS. Results: Overall, 398 of 1024 patients met the criteria for MetS, yielding a prevalence of 38.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 35.9%-41.9%). Compared with patients without MetS, those with MetS were more likely to be male, older, have a higher body mass index, have a longer illness duration, exhibit depressive symptoms, report a history of smoking and alcohol use, and have greater illness severity. In the multivariable analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.65, 95% CI, 1.21-2.25), older age (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.00-1.03), illness duration >5 years (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI, 1.14-2.13), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)-defined depressive symptoms (aOR = 2.71, 95% CI, 1.87-3.92), and high-risk antipsychotic regimens (aOR = 1.54, 95% CI, 1.15-2.06) were independently associated with MetS. High-risk-plus-low-risk combination regimens and chlorpromazine-equivalent (CPZ-eq) dose were not significantly associated with MetS. Conclusions: MetS is highly prevalent in this sample of Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia. The findings highlight the associations of both patient-level characteristics and antipsychotic regimen composition with MetS, whereas the current CPZ-equivalent dose showed no significant association. Enhanced metabolic monitoring and individualized treatment strategies are warranted in inpatient schizophrenia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.