ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Estimated glucose disposal rate outperforms other insulin resistance surrogate indices in predicting cardiometabolic disease and major adverse cardiovascular events in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from UK Biobank.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has rapidly evolved into a pressing global health issue, exacting a formidable and escalating toll on public disease burden. Insulin resistance (IR) serves as a shared pathophysiological pathway for MASLD and cardiometabolic dysfunction. However, the associations between IR surrogate indices, cardiometabolic disease (CMD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in MASLD, particularly the comparative predictive performance of these indicators, have yet to be fully elucidated.
methodsThis large-scale prospective study incorporated 127,195 and 149,402 individuals with MASLD from UK Biobank in CMD and MACE cohort, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to estimate CMD and MACE risks across different IR indices quartiles. Cox regression model and restricted cubic splines (RCS) curve were performed to investigate the associations between IR-related indices, CMD and MACE in MASLD, with threshold effect analysis detecting potential inflection points upon observed nonlinear relationships. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Harrell's C-index, along with net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), were utilized to compare the predictive capability of estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and other IR indices. Furthermore, subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to validate the robustness of primary findings.
resultsDuring a median follow-up time of 13.67 and 13.92 years, 29,089 CMD (22.87%) and 15,445 (10.34%) MACE occurred, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated the risks of CMD and MACE increased progressively in parallel with descending eGDR quartiles (log-rank test, P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, eGDR was significantly associated with incident CMD (per 1 SD, HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.72) and MACE (per 1 SD, HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84), which held true across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. RCS analysis revealed the nonlinear associations between eGDR, CMD and MACE, while turning points were identified at 5.377 and 5.215. Notably, eGDR outperformed other IR surrogate indices in predictions for CMD and MACE overall, as corroborated by all evaluation metrics (AUC, Harrell's C-index, NRI and IDI).
conclusionseGDR demonstrated significant relationships with CMD and MACE in MASLD, yielding comparatively better predictive performance across diverse IR surrogate indices, which suggested its potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.