ArticlePloS one2026
Opportunities and challenges for introduction of balanced energy protein supplementation through routine antenatal care.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplementation during pregnancy in contexts where prevalence of maternal underweight, defined as body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2, is ≥ 20%. Evidence shows that BEP supplementation in underweight pregnant women reduces the risk of low birthweight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth. Yet little is known about how to introduce BEP through routine antenatal care (ANC). This paper explores challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for successful introduction of BEP supplementation through ANC service delivery.
methodsFrom August - December 2023, a mixed-methods landscape analysis was carried out, which comprised of a review of country antenatal care guidelines, as well as key informant interviews (KIIs) with thirteen global and country stakeholders. KIIs were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by themes and subthemes using Dedoose qualitative software 10.0.
resultsFindings revealed confusion around the definition of BEP, coupled with low awareness of the WHO ANC guideline on BEP supplementation among country stakeholders. Provider capacity for BEP provision is weak. Sharing, selling, and stockouts of BEP supplies are common. Data on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the introduction of BEP at country level is critical to inform implementation.
conclusionSuccessful introduction of BEP as part of ANC service delivery requires country program implementers to consider government commitments, health provider training, demand generation, compliance, supplies and logistics, local production, and routine monitoring of BEP indicators. Globally, standardized BEP guidance, indicators, and definitions are critical to support quality country implementation. For sustainability, emerging concerns around reductions in global health funding should be addressed in future program design and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.