ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Drug repurposing in oncology and rare diseases: a clinical pharmacology perspective from candidate identification to implementation.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug repurposing can shorten selected stages of development by using prior pharmacological and clinical knowledge, but successful translation requires more than biological plausibility. This narrative review critically examines repurposing in oncology and rare diseases from a clinical pharmacology perspective, integrating candidate identification, achievable exposure, clinical evidence and implementation. Representative successful and unsuccessful examples are discussed to illustrate the importance of disease-relevant mechanisms, patient selection, meaningful endpoints and development feasibility. Computational methods and real-world data can support hypothesis generation and prioritisation, but require pharmacological validation and prospective assessment of clinical utility. The review also considers European and Italian regulatory pathways and the economic barriers affecting development of established medicines. We argue that repurposing should be evaluated through the coherence of its evidence package and a feasible development pathway, rather than prior approval status or low acquisition cost alone.Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42980672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.