ReviewBMC medicine2026
Evolving role of Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy, safety, economic perspectives, and future directions-a narrative review.
Review in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundB-cell depletion has established an important therapeutic role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in selected patients with an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or with clinical features favoring rituximab. However, the optimal positioning of anti-CD20 therapy remains constrained by heterogeneous treatment responses, cumulative immunosuppression, retreatment strategies, and differences in treatment accessibility. MAIN TEXT: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials, long-term extension studies, real-world cohorts, mechanistic investigations, biosimilar studies, and pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Rituximab remains the only anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with an established clinical role in RA. Newer-generation agents, including ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab, incorporate humanized, fully human, or glycoengineered designs that modify antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, direct cell death, and immunogenicity. Nevertheless, greater B-cell-depleting potency has not consistently translated into an acceptable long-term benefit-risk profile in RA. This discrepancy is described here as a "next-generation paradox," reflecting the narrower safety margin required in chronic autoimmune disease than in hematological malignancies. Rituximab biosimilars may improve treatment accessibility, although their economic impact is strongly dependent on regional procurement and reimbursement systems. Biomarker-guided patient selection, ultra-low-dose maintenance regimens, and dual targeting of B cells and BAFF axis represent promising approaches to treatment optimization., but their routine use remains limited by heterogeneous and, in some cases, non-RA-specific evidence.
conclusionsRituximab retains clinically relevant value in carefully selected patients with RA, particularly seropositive patients and those for whom alternative targeted therapies are unsuitable. Future research should prioritize RA-specific prospective validation of biomarkers, individualized retreatment strategies, long-term immune safety, and regionally relevant pharmacoeconomic models rather than simply pursuing more potent B-cell depletion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.