Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42972205›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Precision Metabolic and Bariatric Medicine: Reconciling Predictive Machine Learning with Explanatory Biostatistics to Validate the Independent Effect of a 10.5% Preoperative TBWL Threshold.

Ioanna Pagani, Maria Syed, Yannis Raftopoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioanna PaganiDepartment of Surgery, Weight Management Program, Holyoke Medical Center, Holyoke, USA. pagani_ioanna@holyokehealth.com.
Maria SyedDepartment of Surgery, Weight Management Program, Holyoke Medical Center, Holyoke, USA.
Yannis RaftopoulosDepartment of Surgery, Weight Management Program, Holyoke Medical Center, Holyoke, USA. raftopoulos_ioannis@holyokehealth.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative total body weight loss (PreopTBWL%) is widely used before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), yet its long-term prognostic value remains debated. This study integrated machine learning (ML), unsupervised clustering, and linear mixed-effects modeling (LMM) to define data-driven preoperative targets and characterize multi-year postoperative weight trajectories.

methodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data and electronic medical records from 802 adults undergoing primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or revision/conversion MBS within a structured, protein-focused preoperative lifestyle program. Five machine learning models were trained with nested cross-validation to predict each postoperative year. Each model used only patients with that year's outcome recorded (608 at Year 1 to 83 at Year 6). From Year 2 onward, earlier postoperative measurements for those patients were included as predictors. Priority was given to Years 1-4. Top-performing SHAP profiles guided feature selection for confirmatory longitudinal LMMs. Although the LMM framework spanned the full 6-year horizon (858 repeated measures from 420 active patients), the most robust inferences were restricted to Years 1-4 because of substantial attrition thereafter. Youden Index optimization, segmented regression, and unsupervised k-means clustering on UMAP embeddings were used to define precise PreopTBWL% targets and map distinct multi-year phenotypic subgroups.

resultsMachine learning models demonstrated strong predictive performance, peaking at Year 2 (Random Forest R² = 0.524 ± 0.033, AUC = 0.875 ± 0.029) and remaining robust through Year 4, with PreopTBWL% consistently ranking among the strongest prognostic features. Unsupervised clustering (k = 5) revealed that preoperative behavioral engagement separated high- from low-performing phenotypes far more powerfully than procedure type or demographics. Initial racial disparities in weight-loss trajectories narrowed progressively and were no longer statistically significant by Year 4 (p = 0.1454). Linear mixed-effects modeling confirmed a robust, independent positive association between PreopTBWL% and long-term outcomes (β = 0.447, p < 0.001). Threshold optimization identified 10.5% PreopTBWL% as the optimal clinical target; patients falling below this threshold experienced a significant long-term deficit (β = -4.608, p = 0.017) that persisted after adjustment for diabetes and operative duration. Interaction terms between the threshold and surgical procedure were non-significant (Threshold × Sleeve, p = 0.532; Threshold × Revision/Conversion, p = 0.778). Segmented regression further identified a structural dose-response breakpoint at 19.68% PreopTBWL%.

conclusionsAchieving ≥ 10.5% PreopTBWL% was associated with durable multi-year PostopTBWL% after MBS, and procedure type did not modify that association in this cohort. By integrating predictive machine learning with explanatory longitudinal modeling, this work shifts preoperative evaluation from arbitrary administrative requirements toward structured, phenotype-guided risk stratification and care escalation.

Indexed as

Body compositionLinear Mixed ModelsMachine learning methodsMetabolic bariatric surgery (MBS)postoperative percent total body weight loss (PostopTBWL%)Preoperative percent total body weight loss (PreopTBWL%)Roux-en-y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomytotal body weight loss (TBWL)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.