ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology2026
Microbiota in liver carcinogenesis: Illuminating the complex relationship.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops predominantly in patients with cirrhosis, yet the biological mechanisms underlying the transition from cirrhosis to malignancy remain incompletely understood. Increasing evidence suggests that the oral-gut-liver axis contributes to this process through coordinated interactions among oral and intestinal microbiota, the epithelial barrier, the immune system, and the liver. While previous reviews have primarily focused on gut dysbiosis in cirrhosis and its complications, emerging evidence indicates that microbiome-associated alterations actively contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. In this review, we propose a transition-state model in which disruption of the oral-gut-liver axis promotes progression from cirrhosis to HCC through functional microbiome insufficiency, epithelial barrier dysfunction, microbial translocation, inflammatory remodeling, and immune dysregulation. We emphasize that disruption of microbial metabolic functions, including reduced butyrate biosynthesis, bile acid remodeling, altered tryptophan metabolism, and enrichment of virulence-associated pathways may be more biologically relevant than taxonomic changes alone. We further discuss emerging biomarkers representing distinct domains of the gut-liver axis, including butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase (BCoAT) as a marker of microbial function, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) as a marker of epithelial injury, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) as a marker of microbial translocation and endotoxemia. Finally, we discuss the translational implications of integrating microbiome-derived functional biomarkers with immune and clinical profiling for biological risk stratification, early detection, and precision hepatology as well as therapeutic strategies based on microbiome modulation. This framework shifts the focus from descriptive dysbiosis toward mechanistic host-microbiome interactions, highlights the oral-gut-liver axis as an active contributor to hepatocarcinogenesis, and provides a conceptual foundation for future microbiome-informed surveillance, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.