Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42971664›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology2026

Microbiota in liver carcinogenesis: Illuminating the complex relationship.

Natthaya Chuaypen, Thasinas Dissayabutra, Jasmohan S Bajaj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natthaya ChuaypenCenter of Excellence in Kidney-Liver-Microbiota, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thasinas DissayabutraCenter of Excellence in Kidney-Liver-Microbiota, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jasmohan S BajajDepartment of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Medicine, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: Jasmohan.bajaj@vcuhealth.org.

Funding

Fecal microbiota transplant for Alcohol-Associated CirrhosisR01AA029398 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Jasmohan S Bajaj, ALEXANDER KHORUTS · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Hepatic Encephalopathy in Alcoholic Cirrhosis: A Systems Biology ApproachR01AA020203 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BAJAJ, JASMOHAN S · 2010 to 2012
$1.0M
CSRD VA I01 CX002472CSRD VA I01 CX002863NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020203NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA029398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops predominantly in patients with cirrhosis, yet the biological mechanisms underlying the transition from cirrhosis to malignancy remain incompletely understood. Increasing evidence suggests that the oral-gut-liver axis contributes to this process through coordinated interactions among oral and intestinal microbiota, the epithelial barrier, the immune system, and the liver. While previous reviews have primarily focused on gut dysbiosis in cirrhosis and its complications, emerging evidence indicates that microbiome-associated alterations actively contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. In this review, we propose a transition-state model in which disruption of the oral-gut-liver axis promotes progression from cirrhosis to HCC through functional microbiome insufficiency, epithelial barrier dysfunction, microbial translocation, inflammatory remodeling, and immune dysregulation. We emphasize that disruption of microbial metabolic functions, including reduced butyrate biosynthesis, bile acid remodeling, altered tryptophan metabolism, and enrichment of virulence-associated pathways may be more biologically relevant than taxonomic changes alone. We further discuss emerging biomarkers representing distinct domains of the gut-liver axis, including butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase (BCoAT) as a marker of microbial function, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) as a marker of epithelial injury, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) as a marker of microbial translocation and endotoxemia. Finally, we discuss the translational implications of integrating microbiome-derived functional biomarkers with immune and clinical profiling for biological risk stratification, early detection, and precision hepatology as well as therapeutic strategies based on microbiome modulation. This framework shifts the focus from descriptive dysbiosis toward mechanistic host-microbiome interactions, highlights the oral-gut-liver axis as an active contributor to hepatocarcinogenesis, and provides a conceptual foundation for future microbiome-informed surveillance, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCarcinoma, HepatocellularGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLiverLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsAnimalsBacterial TranslocationDisease ProgressionDysbiosisHumansIntestinal Barrier FunctionBiomarkersCirrhosisFunctional microbiome insufficiencyHepatocellular carcinomaOral–gut–liver axis

Identifiers

PMID42971664
PMCPMC13728467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.